On 2 November 2007 The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) released a final EIS on the Colorado River which will operate the river system such that all seven basin states will "share the pain" during drought years.
Below is an article that appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune on 3 November 2007. I have also posted a copy of the USBR press release at the bottom of this post.
**************
Plan Manages Colorado River in Drought
Patty Henetz, the Salt Lake Tribune, 3 November 2007
The Law of the River has gotten another adjustment with a federal plan to manage the Colorado River during dry years.
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on Friday released a final environmental impact study that could be a way to avoid renegotiating an 85-year-old agreement based on inflated notions of how much water really is in the river.
Or, according to river advocates, the plan that will govern use and allocation through 2026 could be a way to ensure none of the seven Western states that share the river ever has enough water.
The study's conclusions drew from a consensus decision by the seven Western states that depend on the Colorado River on what to do during low-water years, officials said.
"This is an arrangement for operating the river where everyone shares the pain when you're going through a drought time," said Tom Ryan, a Bureau of Reclamation hydrologist in Salt Lake City.
The Bureau of Reclamation began the environmental study in 1999. Since then, the river basin has experienced the worst drought in 100 years of recorded history, and its two largest reservoirs - Lake Powell and Lake Mead - have gone from being nearly full to just over half-full.
The report, expected to be final in late December, plans how the upper basin states - Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, and New Mexico - will respond to demand from California, Arizona, and Nevada, the lower basin states, which have more people and older water rights.
While the Bureau of Reclamation implicitly acknowledges that the 1922 Colorado River Compact is based on estimates from unusually wet years and its report assumes ongoing shortages, it doesn't suggest any changes to the agreement.
"Nobody wants to renegotiate the compact. The feeling is the compact provides an adequate framework for managing the river," Ryan said.
But to John Weisheit, conservation director for the non-profit organization Living Rivers, the bureau's solution entrenches wastefulness and refuses to acknowledge ways to store water more effectively.
"We're extremely disappointed," he said. "Now we're playing this balancing act between two reservoirs that climate change is going to keep empty."
Living Rivers has long campaigned to decommission the Glen Canyon dam and rely on Lake Mead for surface water storage. The organization also believes using aquifers in Arizona and California to store water underground would be a better solution. But the main problem with the bureau's solution is there's not enough water, which speeds destruction of the river ecosystem, Weisheit said.
***********
Here is a copy of the press release.
"Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand." -- Anonymous

Where can we get information on the proposed water projects in the latest bill? For instance, in New Mexico, what does "Bosque Restoration" mean for us?
Posted by: Michelle Meaders | November 11, 2007 at 05:51 AM
Hi, Michelle.
To which bill are you referring? In this post there is nothing about a bill or the NM bosque; it's about the Colorado River EIS. If you are referring to the Water Resources Development Act that was recently passed over the President's veto, you need to contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Posted by: Michael | November 11, 2007 at 08:04 AM
Yes, that's the one -- I know it wasn't related to the post, but knew you would know about it.
Posted by: Michelle Meaders | November 11, 2007 at 07:24 PM
Hi, Michelle.
Okay - glad I can help. Here's the WWW site for the USACE:
www.usace.army.mil
I suspect the Albuquerque office is handling the bosque work and you can get to the Albuquerque site from the main site. Or just give them a call. Good luck!
Posted by: Michael | November 12, 2007 at 06:17 AM