Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad

Favorite Blogs

  • Aguanomics
    The economics of water (and some other stuff), courtesy of economist David Zetland.
  • Water SISWEB
    From UC-Davis water students. More than just a blog, it's a water resources community social bookmarking site. The users run the show, and all can participate.
  • Great Lakes Law
    Noah Hall's blog about - what else - all things wet and legal in the Great Lakes region!
  • Misublog
    Laura Makar's blog is designed to inform and contribute to the discussion of water policy.
  • AWRA
    The water resources blog of the American Water Resources Association.
  • Campanastan
    That's 'Campana-stan', or 'Place of Campana', formerly 'Aquablog'. Michael Campana's personal blog, promulgating his Weltanschauung.
  • Waterblogged
    Shaun McKinnon of the Arizona Republic.
  • Waterblogged.info
    Jared Simpson's water blog. Great writing and insight, for non-water wonks, too.
  • Water For The Ages
    Abby, another PNWer, writes about global water issues with passion and concern.
  • Crooks and Liars
    John Amato's blog about...'Crooks and Liars'.
  • H2O Podcast
    Joseph Puentes does us WaterWonks a service by posting podcasts of conferences, etc.
  • H2ONCoast
    Oregon's North Coast water blog by Rob Emanuel of Oregon State University's Sea Grant program.
  • Aquafornia
    Aqua Blog Maven's awesome Southern California water blog. Everything you need to know about SoCal water issues, and more!
  • Western Water Blog
    The 'mystery blog' about Western USA water issues. What more can I say?
  • WaterWired
    All things fresh water. A service of the Institute for Water and Watersheds at Oregon State University (water.oregonstate.edu).
  • Water Words That Work
    From Eric Eckl, a communications and marketing expert for environmental and other progressive causes.
  • Watercrunch
    The sound when water and people collide. Robert Osborne emphasizes Southeastern USA water issues. Excellent graphics and features.
  • John Fleck
    Science writer at the Albuquerque Journal. Great stuff on climate, water, and more.
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

World Water

July 03, 2008

The Desiccation of Turkey's Lakes

OMEDDRY_P2 View this slide show from the Christian Science Monitor. Read the related story, the source of the photo by Melanie Stetson Freeman.

Here are the first few paragraphs of Nicole Itano's story:

Arif Karaoglu recalls the days when Lake Aksehir lapped at the foot of the village mosque and residents had to build high walls to protect their homes from flooding. Now, when he looks out across the landscape, he sees only a vast, sandy plateau. Until recently, a body of water three times the size of Washington, D.C., filled the plain.

"Dust," laments Mr. Karaoglu, who moved to the village in 1942. "There's nothing but dust."

Dubbed the country's grain warehouse, central Turkey's Konya plain has long been known for its beautiful lakes and vast fields, which produce 10 percent of Turkey's agricultural yield. But both are now threatened by a severe water shortage that dramatically illustrates a broader regional crisis.

"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." -- Euripides

June 21, 2008

Virtual Water: Good, Bad, Or Ugly?

Cynthia Barnett, author of Mirage, told me that the current Forbes has a very good article on virtual water, that amount of water required to produce  and trade certain items, be they crops, clothes, automobiles, etc.

Tony Allan, winner of the 2008 Stockholm Water Prize, introduced the virtual water concept in 1993, which measures how water is embedded in the production and trade of food and consumer products.

Virtual water is neither inherently good nor bad; it just "is".  

We in the USA export a lot of water as virtual water, especially in our food products, and the article illustrates this. If someone came and said, "Sell me water from the High Plains (sometimes called 'Ogallala') aquifer," instead of saying, "Hell no!", we should more correctly say "We already do - that aquifer waters America's breadbasket and we export water in the form of wheat and other crops."

It is something we don't think much about, but it's there. Perhaps there are some places in the USA where crops that require huge amounts of water should not be grown because they use too much precious water.

It's a conversation we've not yet had on a national scale, but should. And soon.

"Til taught by pain, men really know not what good water is worth." -- from Don Juan by Byron (courtesy of Leslie Kryder)

June 09, 2008

Turkmenistan (formerly 'Absurdistan'): Let's Make a Lake in the Desert!

Turkmenistan, to which I gave the moniker "Absurdistan" (or "Berzerkistan" in Doonesbury) during the tenure of its late nutso dictator-megalomaniac Saparmurat Niyazov  (aka 'Turkmenbashi' - 'Father of all Turkmens'), is proceeding with its grand scheme to create a lake in the desert. The plan was hatched by Turkmenbashi, who broke ground in 2000, and will be located in the northwest part of the country, southwest of Sarykamish Lake (see smaller map), in the Karashor Depression. It will be called the Golden Age Lake, and will become "the symbol of revival of the Turkmen land", according to Turkmenbashi.  

The lake will cover about 3500 square kilometers (1,350 square miles), approximately the size of the Great Salt Lake. The lake is supposed to contain 135-145 cubic kilometers of water and be as deep as 130 meters (425 feet).

Map_of_turkmenistan

1002-1-thumb

Water for the lake will come from two drainage canals, which will bring irrigation drainage water from the irrigation projects in the eastern and southeastern parts of the country. These projects are fed by the Amu Darya, the river the roughly forms the boundary with Uzbekistan, and produce primarily cotton.

The Turkmens claim the project will reclaim salt-damaged formerly arable land, protect archaeological sites from being destroyed by salt and rising water tables, create migratory bird habitat and an inland fishery. But the lake's water will be laden with chemicals - it's irrigation return flow, after all. The lake will take decades to fill (if it ever does); critics question whether the lake will fill, because of high evaporation rates and seepage losses.

Another worry is that the Turkmens, in an effort to purify the lake water, will withdraw more water from the Amu Darya, which would not please the Uzbeks. And that's an understatement.

Thumbnail_large_careerbreak06_1154290740_dsc_1205 The project may not be a done deal, because since the death of Turkmenbashi, Turkmenistan has "opened up" more and is more sensitive to world opinion. New President Gurbanguly Berdimuhammedow may reconsider the project. After all, I have heard that Turkmenbashi's 12-meter high golden statue that rotated to always face the sun has been dismantled.

I remember attending a Central Asian water meeting in Almaty, Kazakhstan, two years ago, when Turkmenbashi was still alive. We were all surprised to see a water engineer from the Turkmenistan government there, as they usually eschewed such meetings. He told us that every request to leave the country had to be personally approved by Turkmenbashi.  

Turkmenistan is #5 in the world in terms of natural gas reserves (this ranking includes reserves over which they are bargaining with other Caspian Sea nations; the CIA ranks them #13). Government officials recently visited Azerbaijan, in part to discuss a trans-Caspian gas pipeline.     

Here is an excellent article from Science with all the information, including a larger version of the thumbnail map:

Download turkmenistan_lake.pdf

"Halk, Watan, Turkmenbashi" ["People, Country, Me"] -- favorite slogan of Saparmurat Niyazov, aka 'Turkmenbashi'

June 08, 2008

The Golan Gamble: Middle East Peace...Or Not?

300px-Golan_heights_rel89B Okay, here's a good one: Turkey provides Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Lebanon, Jordan, and Syria with just about all the water they could possibly use, Israel withdraws from the Golan Heights, and everybody is happy!

Someone's been smoking too much of the evil weed, right? Actually, maybe not.

Check out this story from the Jerusalem Report in the 5 June 2008 Jerusalem Post.

The plan would provide water in the amount of 2 - 3 billion cubic meters ( 1.6 - 2.4 million acre-feet) per year from the Ceyhan and Seyhan Rivers of Turkey.The plan was originally proposed by Turkey in the 1980s, but was shelved when Turkish-Syrian relations soured in the 1990s.  

From the article by Leslie Susser:

The water would be channeled from Turkey, which enjoys a huge water surplus, in underground pipes and overland canals through western Syria to the southern slopes of Mount Hermon, where it would flow into a dam along the length of the northern stretch of a new Israeli-Syrian border, providing hydro-electric power and serving as a major obstacle against a tank blitz from the Golan Heights, which would be returned to Syria as part of the projected peace package. Some of the water en route would be diverted to Lebanon and water from the dam channeled to Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority.

"Everybody wins," says the plan's author, water engineer Boaz Wachtel, an Israeli fellow at the Washington-based Freedom House, which promotes democracy, peace and human rights. "The Arabs and Israelis get water and stability, the Turks hard currency and enhanced international status."

But this is not a done deal. Again, from the article:

But the dream of peace with Syria with all its attendant benefits - Syria in the pro-Western Arab camp, freed from Iranian tutelage and no longer supporting Palestinian and Lebanese militants - is not universally shared. Israeli hawks, who oppose any withdrawal from the Golan, accuse Wachtel and Liel of living in a fantasy world - and the government of Ehud Olmert of playing dangerous games in its efforts to survive the corruption scandals engulfing the prime minister. There is, they say, no chance of Syria breaking away from the radical Iranian-led axis and handing over the Golan would simply be turning it into an Iranian forward base for attacking Israel. "All this talk about making peace and sharing water is pie in the sky," scoffs the Likud's Yisrael Katz, chairman of the Knesset's Golan caucus.

And more:

The outcome of negotiations with Syria as well as the fate of Wachtel's ambitious water scheme could depend on the results of the next Israeli election. With Olmert wobbling over corruption allegations, pundits are talking about a November ballot, with the Likud's Benjamin Netanyahu, who opposes territorial compromise with Syria, the front-runner according to public opinion polls.

Here's what Likud leader and former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu thinks of the idea. No, he's not a fan.

Ah, water - the great peacemaker! This will get interesting.

"You don't make peace with friends. You make it with very unsavory enemies." -- Yitzhak Rabin

May 31, 2008

Turkey Thinks Big: Southeastern Anatolia Project Returns

Turkey has resurrected its Southeastern Anatolia Project (also known by its Turkish acronym, GAP), according to a recent article by Yigal Schleifer in the Christian Science Monitor. The hydroelectric-irrigation project, slated to cost about $32B, promises to bring economic development to the region, long an economic backwater. The area is also home to many restive Kurds and the militant Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), considered a  "terrorist" group by some (USA, NATO, EU).

GAP_Region  

The project is being developed by DSI, the State Hydraulic Works, a government organization similar to our U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It's important to the entire country, as it will produce much needed electricity. Other than geothermal resources, Turkey has no energy resoources other than hydroelectricity.

I recall visiting a DSI project as part of a conference field trip in 1995. It was on the fringes of the GAP area, and I remember transferring from our huge Mercedes buses to small minibuses for the long, hot, dusty, bumpy, ride to the damsite. When I got there, I was mesmerized by spectacular cascades of water gushing frrom a huge wall (maybe 100m high by 500m long) of fractured limestone (this was a karst conference). It was one of the largest springs in the world.  

The springs would be submerged by a huge dam (anchored in fractured limestone - that's another story), and the locals, including some Kurds, were none too happy about this. But the official line was that this would be a huge boon to the region and that most of the people were on board. Duhhhhh....Sound familiar?

Besides the springs, another prominent feature was the large number of Turkish soldiers present. We were told this was normal for such a large project - to protect equipment, etc. Later, one of our Turkish colleagues told us that the PKK had learned of the visit by all these "famous" scientists and had threatened to stage an "event".

Some of my Turkish friends are not excited about the return of GAP, and worry about the effects on the populace while questioning the economic benefits.

Will the Kurds be placated? Probably not - there are issues other than the economy that concern them.   

"We don't have a Kurdish problem in Turkey; we have a 'Mountain Turk' problem." -- A Turkish colleague of mine

May 29, 2008

Is Water The 'New Oil'? Tell Me Something I Don't Know

The 28 May 2008 issue of the Christian Science Monitor (arguably the best newspaper in the USA, by the way) has a story by Mark Clayton that asks "Is water becoming the new oil?"

For readers of this and other water blogs, this is not a provocative headline: the media has been full of water shortage and water privatization stories in the past few years. Some of the usual suspects are cited: the always logical Peter Gleick, and the always peripatetic Maude Barlow, who weighs in with her usual dose of enlightenment:

“Water is a public resource and a human right that should be available to all,” she says. “All these companies are doing is recycling dirty water, selling it back to utilities and us at a huge price. But they haven’t been as successful as they want to be. People are concerned about their drinking water and they’ve met resistance.”

Yes, water should be available to all. But "All these companies...recycling dirty water" - does she mean water reuse, whereby water is treated to drinking-water standards and then sold as such? How despicable! Public utilities do this too, Maude - try the Orange County Water District in SoCal. Shouldn't the OCWD be allowed to recover the cost of water treatment?  

The article does focus heavily on privatization, and of course, cites the pathetic case of Cochabamba, Bolivia, out of which Bechtel was tossed in 2000 over high prices for water. What you never hear about is what a mess the public utility had made of the city's water-supply system. That does not justify turning over the keys to the safe to multinationals like Bechtel, but if the city had done a good job of managing the water supply and maintaining the infrastructure, Bechtel would not have been needed.

People forget that you don't have to have a private, profit-making utility to have a good water system. A publicly-owned system can charge a "fair price" for water, one that ensures the utility can maintain the system and yet not give the resource away. I don't care what your economic status is; if you get water for free or for an unreasoably low price, you won't value it and you will waste it. That is the last thing we need in these times. That is what people like Maude Barlow forget: you cannot give water away for nothing or next to nothing. Well, you can, but...

And a private utility is not necessarily the devil incarnate. If a community votes to turn over its water supply utility to a private utility because they think it can do a better job, they should do so with their eyes open, ensuring that there are oversight and lifeline rates. 

The article notes that the Canadian House of Commons voted last year to begin talks with Mexico and the USA to exclude water from NAFTA.

And I just heard about a local Pacific Northwest legislator who annually wants to sell one million acre feet (1 MAF) of Pacific Northwest water "internationally" at a penny per gallon to make $3.26 billion per year for the public coffers! Such a deal! Why sell it internationally? Just ship it to Las Vegas or SoCal.

This person will likely have his head handed to him. But what if entrepreneurs in the PNW used 1 MAF to produce or grow widgets, then sold these things overseas for a hefty profit? People would applaud them. But they are still shipping 1 MAF of water overseas, only it is "virtual water". Why not eliminate the middleman and just sell the water?

Oh yeah, the article does have one flaw: it says Canada (which has often been mentioned as a supply for the USA) has 20% of the world's fresh water. If you have been a faithful reader of this blog, you will know the error of that statement.

But don't let that stop you from reading a great article.

“Never underestimate the collective stupidity of very smart people in small groups.” – Unknown


 

May 25, 2008

South Caucasus River Monitoring Project: Water for Peace in a Volatile and Strategic Region

So after all these travel posts, you're perhaps wondering what bearing they have on water and why I'm posting them on WaterWired.

My reason for traveling to Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Armenia is the South Caucasus River Monitoring project, which is funded by NATO (Science for Peace sub-Programme, part of the Science for Peace and Security Programme) and OSCE. The NATO program is specifically aimed at scientists in former Soviet republics and Eastern-bloc countries, to engage them in peaceful activities. 

Our project deals with the Kura-Araks basin, outlined in blue below. From the SCRM WWW site above, you can access the project's official WWW site (hosted by Azerbaijan) with the water quality and quantity data collected by teams from each of the three countires. Monthly sampling at about 10 surface-water sites in each country (12 in Azerbaijan) is performed for a variety of constituents: major and minor ions, selected heavy metals, POPs (persistent organic pollutants - e.g., pesticides), and radionuclides.

There are no water agreements (use, allocation, quality) in the Kura-Araks basin among the three South Caucasus countries. During the Soviet period, all decisions came from Moscow.  

Caucasus-basin

Much of the project funding has gone for state-of-the-art analytical equipment for each country. Along with standard sampling and analytical protocols, this will ensure that each country can "trust" the work of the other ones.

This trust is important in an area that has been, and still is, rife with disagreements, conflict, and mistrust. With mutual trust, cooperation is enhanced and the prospect of conflict is reduced.

We hope that this cooperation (excellent, by the way) at the technical level can then "diffuse upward" into the political arena. We're essentially using water as an agent of peace in a volatile, strategic, region.

We are particularly proud of the SCRM project, because it was the first one funded by NATO that dealt specifically with the environment. We are in our sixth and final year.

At the SCRM WWW site you can also download a couple of Master's reports prepared by two former students of mine, Amy Ewing and Berrin Basak Vener. Below you can also download a paper by Berrin and me that I presented at 'The Last Drop' conference in The Hague in December 2006. It's a summary of her Master's report with some additional information.

Download venercampana_last_drop_paper.pdf

Water does not necessarily have to be a source of conflict. Indeed, it can bring people together.

And bring on that 'Great Game'!

“Handguns are acceptable; semi-automatic weapons must be checked at reception.” – sign on the door of the Metechi Palace Hotel in Tbilisi, Georgia (the sign was removed when the hotel became a Sheraton)

      

May 15, 2008

UN Human Rights Council: Water Not A Global Human Right, or NAFTA 'Rains' Supreme

Abby Brown posted this item on her Water For The Ages blog, 11 May 2008. Germany and Spain wanted to pass a resolution proposing that water be a global human right. But the USA and Canada - yes Canada (Oh, Canada!), homeland of the indefatigable Maude Barlow - wanted and got the wording changed so as not to interfere with NAFTA, which defines water as a "good and investment".  Or should that be a "good investment"?

Looks like the UN could learn from our friends in South Africa.

"When the people take to reasoning, all is lost." -- Voltaire

May 14, 2008

WaterWired and Campanastan Head for the South Caucasus

WaterWired needs a little break, so along with my alter ego Campanastan, I am heading to the Caucasusindex oily shores of the Caspian Sea for a five-day stop in Baku, Azerbaijan, then an overnight stay in Tbilisi, Georgia, and finally to Yerevan, Armenia, for five days. I return home on Memorial Day evening.

So is this a true vacation? Not really. I am going over in my role as the director of the South Caucasus River Monitoring project, which is funded by NATO and OSCE. It's our sixth and final year.

I work with some great people over there - Professor Nodar Kekelidze (Georgia), Dr. Bahruz Suleymanov (Azerbaijan), and Dr. Armen Saghatelyan in Armenia. They and their colleagues do all the heavy lifting, along with NATO experts Dr. Freddy Adams (Belgium; analytical chemistry) and Dr. Eiliv Steinnes (Norway; environmental chemistry).

I doubt I'll be posting daily, but should be able to get a few out. At least I'll have some travel tales when I return home.

"Surround yourself with the best people you can find, delegate authority, and don't interfere." -- Ronald Reagan, cover of Fortune, 15 September 1986

May 09, 2008

China, Tibet, and Water

The Tibetan Plateau, source to great rivers (Brahmaputra, Ganges, Yellow, Yangtze, Indus, Irrawaddy, Mekong) in whose basins live well over 2 billion people, may be at the heart of the China-Tibet "debate".

Why? Water, that's why.

TopogrphThe region (shown in red), at 2.5 million square kilometers about four times the size of Texas, covers almost 2% of the Earth's land surface. It is the world's biggest plateau, and has an average elevation of almost 15,000 feet (4500 meters). It plays a significant role in the climate of the planet. Its glaciers nourish the aforementioned rivers and others. And it is those glaciers that may be at the heart of China's "interest" in keeping Tibet on a tight leash.

Circle of Blue has an excellent article about the strategic power of water in the China-Tibet debate (thanks to Eric Daigh).

Like many other resources, water is of great concern to China. I've previously posted on China's water issues: Three Gorges Dam; the Great South-to-North water transfer; and the dust-up with Kazakhstan over Lake Balkhash.

The take-away: what with Tibtean Plateau glaciers shrinking because of climate change and China's water development plans, the Indians, Vietnamese, Laotians, Cambodians, Bangladeshis, Burmese, et al. might have cause for concern.

And perhaps the rest of us, too.

"In the world there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, there is nothing that can surpass it." -- Lao-tze, 6th century BCE

May 04, 2008

'The Economist' Looks At Water Wars: What, No Ground Water?

The current (3 May 2008) issue of The Economist contains a piece on 'Streams of blood, or streams of peace', about the potential for nations going to war over water. It's a good article, examining a number of river basins around the world with the potential for conflict.

Cir970This map shows the Nile, Tigris-Euphrates, and Jordan River Basins, three of the 263 transboundary river basins where cooperation exists but where conflict could arise.

Some of the work in cited in the article has been done by my colleagues at Oregon State University (OSU). We have a remarkable database, the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD), a resource for the entire world.

My friend and colleague at Oregon State University, Aaron Wolf, creator of the TFDD and arguably the world's expert on water conflict, contends that the only documented instance of two states going to war solely over water involved two Mesopotamian city-states about 4,500 years ago.

One interesting story he tells involves Turkey's refusal to "shut off" river water to Iraq during the first Gulf War, despite the Americans' pleas. The Turks let the USA use bases, conduct overflights and troop movements for the first Iraq War, but drew the line at using water as a weapon.

But the article, like many others on the topic, conveniently neglects to mention ground water. Yet there are aquifer systems that could foment conflict; in fact, there are about 240 aquifer systems that underlie two or more nations.

Was__wasser__startseite__gw__erde_2 There are programs underway to delineate these aquifers.The ISARM (International Shared Aquifer Resource Management) project is one, as is WHYMAP (World-wide Hydrogeological Mapping and Assessment Programme).

The world map shows transboundary aquifers; it is available from the WHYMAP WWW site.

6a00d8341bf80a53ef00e55128d843883_2The Guarani aquifer of South America, which may be the largest body of unfrozen fresh water in the world, has the potential for generating conflict among Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

Aquifers underlying North Africa have similar conflict potential. Here in North America, the USA shares ground water basins with both Canada and Mexico, so conflict is a possibility.

It's all too easy to forget about ground water; after all, out of sight, out of mind. But we must remember that when it comes to unfrozen water, fresh ground water far exceeds fresh surface water. It's not even close; one estimate puts the amount at 100x more.

That huge reservoir of subsurface water could figure prominently in any future water wars.

"War is the unfolding of miscalculations." -- Barbara Tuchman

April 28, 2008

Jeffrey Sachs Solves the Water Crisis

9781594201271lWell, maybe not. But the current issue (28 April 2008) of Newsweek features "Rivers Running Dry" and economist Jeffrey D. Sachs' latest book, Common Wealth: Economics for a Crowded Planet. In the piece, Sachs, who is head of Columbia University's Earth Institute, offers some comments on the water crisis and some solutions.

I've not read his book yet. Yes, I will post a review when I finish it.

Wonder what William Easterly would think of it? For those of you who don't know, Sachs and Easterly go back and forth about the best way to "do development". Just Google "Easterly vs. Sachs". I will post on their kerfluffle shortly.

If the article is any indication of what Sachs thinks about water and the solutions we need, then it's nothing new for us Water Wonks. Yeah, things are bad and will probably get worse. But perhaps Sachs' book will convince others - politicians, "regular people", et al. - that action is needed. If it does that, then he's done us all a service.

One thing that the USA needs is a national water policy - not a plan, but a policy.  The American Water Resources Association (AWRA) has been calling for such a policy in its Water Dialogues. [Disclosure notice: I sit on the Board of the AWRA.]The USA muddles along, going from crisis to crisis.

Here is the first paragraph from Jeneen Interlandi's Newsweek article:

Remember last fall when the city of Atlanta was said to be just weeks away from running dry? It's getting warm in the Southeast again, and Lake Lanier, which supplies water to parts of three states (Georgia, Alabama and Florida) is still down 13 feet from where it should be this time of year. Part of the fault lies with the Army Corps of Engineers, which regulates the outflow from the lake down the Chattahoochee River and sent billions of gallons into the Atlantic to protect the endangered sturgeon population, based on a plan that had not been updated since 1989. It also lost an additional 22 billion gallons, owing to a broken gauge. But the bigger problem is the lack of a coherent policy for collecting, conserving and using fresh water there, or in much of the rest of the United States, or, for that matter, the world.

P4170026_2

Here is a recent photo of Lake Lanier, courtesy of Don Mahin.

Here's an interesting snippet from the Newsweek article:

Economists and geologists have identified one culprit in the water-management problem, a mind-set they call "stationarity"—the belief that natural systems fluctuate within a narrow, predictable range, even over long periods. "Stationarity is dead," says Chris Milly, author of a recent Science paper on the issue—done in by population growth, climate change and economic development. But the effect of the stationarity fallacy has been to leave water policy in the hands of relatively shortsighted municipal and state authorities, while the federal government has been looking the other way. [emboldening mine]

That last sentence is pretty brutal. What is meant by "shortsighted"? The few municipal water managers I know in the West are not what I call "shortsighted". In fact, a number of Western municipal water utilities - Seattle and Portland come to mind - have joined to cope with climate change and its effect on water availability. I don't always agree with Pat Mulroy, but I would not accuse her of being shortsighted. Some states are incorporating climate change into their planning efforts. 

Here is a related article from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution about Rep. John Linder (R-GA), one of the founders of the House Water Caucus.  He's trying to establish a National Water Commission.

One group we need to get on board is the business community. Not just the Warren Buffets and his ilk, but others as well - local/regional business leaders. If I tell some politician we need a national water policy, nothing will get done. If Buffet, Bill Gates, or Paul Otellini (Intel CEO) says that, you know the politicos will listen; the state and local politicians will respond to state/local business leaders as well as the national/international ones.

That's where we Water Wonks have failed, by not engaging the business community. Money talks - we all know that.

And business people know that they need water to make money. Sin agua, no hay dinero.

You go, Jeff!

"With great power comes great responsibility." -- Spiderman

April 25, 2008

Today is World Malaria Day

Title05

Today is world World Malaria Day.

This is a disease that we in the USA don't think much about - it's been virtually eradicated from the USA for many years. But in the developing world, it is a scourge; 3,000 children per day die from this disease, most of them in Africa.

This is a preventable disease - a device as simple as a bed screen (mosquito net) works wonders. Mosquito nets, along with duct tape and chlorine bleach, are on my list as three of the greatest human inventions for those in developing countries.

Visit the WWW site to see what you can do.

"Only by being bold and ambitious in our approach can we combat and ultimately eradicate this disease." -- Hon. Gordon Brown, UK Prime Minister

April 24, 2008

OSU Offers New Graduate Certificate in Water Conflict Management and Transformation

Oregon State University (OSU) is now offering a new Professional/Graduate Certificate in Water Conflict Management and Transformation. Click here for more information. [Disclosure notice: I am at OSU and am an affiliated faculty member with this program.]

The following text is from the Program's WWW site.

Tfdd_top_logos

This program is designed to provide decision-makers and water professionals with the required specialized resources and skills that go beyond the traditional physical systems approach to water resources management. It will explicitly integrate human, policy and scientific dimensions of water resources within the framework of governance and sustainability.

The Professional/Graduate Certificate in Water Conflict Management and Transformation will invite instructors, students, and professionals from across the state, the country and internationally to participate in case-based, interactive course and fieldwork in a multicultural and multidisciplinary learning environment. This 18-credit graduate certificate provides in-depth skills-building training to enhance personal and institutional capacity in water governance issues and strategies across distinct and overlapping contexts: Water Governance, Water and Ecosystems, Water and Society, and Water and Economics.

A highlight of the professional/graduate certificate program is a capstone course (Water Governance and Conflict Management) coupled with an intersession practicum working with watershed councils, landowners, and agencies in Northeast Oregon; and a guided and critiqued project in which two teams take on, for example, the roles of Jordan and Israel to negotiate a treaty for water resource allocation in a simulated water negotiation. These techniques will hone student skills, understanding and thought development. Students will also take part in fieldwork in a watershed or basin at risk of, or in, water conflict. Read about the 2007 practicum, in the article entitled "Outside looking in: OSU students get a taste of community-based restoration in the Grande Ronde Watershed."

It is expected that candidates entering this program will already have a Bachelor's Degree and will enroll in the university, either into a graduate degree program or into the graduate certificate program. All the courses listed in the program are currently offered at OSU and some are offered as online courses. Presently, we are also working towards developing new e-courses to provide online candidates with an opportunity to successfully complete the entire program online.

Program affiliated faculty have designed and implemented a broad spectrum of applied activities in the Western U.S. and throughout the world, including: facilitations and skills-building workshops between stakeholders at both the transnational and international levels; skills-building workshops and training courses for graduate students and professionals from mid-career through the ministerial level; and collaborative learning processes in which stakeholders develop conflict management skills while enhancing dialog on current issues of dispute.

See a list of courses related to water conflict and management that are currently offered at OSU.

"If we work together, a secure and sustainable water future can be ours ." -- Kofi Annan, February 2002

April 22, 2008

Expo Zaragoza 2008

Expozaragoza2008 On this 38th anniversary of Earth Day, what could more appropriate than another meeting with the theme of Water and Sustainable Development? That is indeed the theme of Expo Zaragoza 2008.

This officially-sanctioned (by the French) world exposition occurs from 14 June though 14 September, 2008, in Zaragoza, Spain, the old capital of the Kingdom of Aragon on the Rio Ebro.  The official WWW site did not have a lot of information about the Expo; try this Wikipedia entry instead, which has far more information in a more organized manner. There is an official blog (en espanol).

The official mascot of Expo Zaragoza 2008 is Fluvi, the male water drop. I confess to being ignorant that water drops have gender, but then again, this is Spanish, and a noun needs a gender.150pxexpo_2008__fluvi_en_el_pilar_3 Fluvi looks like a deformed amphibian, which I suppose is par for the course these days.

Here is Fluvi will his little best friend Ica, who apparently has just one eye and is hermaphroditic. Bummer, Ica. (BOHICA, Ica!)

My wife, who's been there, done that, tells me that Zaragoza has the largest church in the world. She also told me that 14 June - 14 September is not a great time to be there. Can you spell "hot"?

104 countries have signed up to participate; I did not see the USA listed. We must be annoyed with Spain, perhaps because the Spanish Prime Minister, José Zapatero, is a Socialist (but King Juan Carlos did tell Hugo Chávez to shut up, so that must count for something).

Anyway, I'll have to pass on Fluvi, Ica, and their buddies. I'd love to go, but...

"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it." -- Groucho Marx

April 11, 2008

Water: H2O = Life; Aqua Colbert

H_banner

The American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) has an extraordinary exhibit Water: H2O = Life.

This special exhibit about water highlights the importance of the world's most precious resource. The exhibit includes hands-on activities and interactive displays to educate the public about water-where it comes from, how it shapes the planet and the lives of people, plants, and animals everywhere.

The Colbert Report even featured the exhibit on its 20 March 2008 show, along with Stephen Colbert's line of bottled water, Aqua Colbert. You can also find all these videos on Misublog.

Aquacolbertdisplay_2

"When you've got an extraordinary thirst, don't settle for an ordinary water that comes from just one foreign country. When you drink Aqua Colbert, you're drinking the world."

"Thirst locally, drink globally." -- Aqua Colbert's slogan

March 27, 2008

Ecological Infrastructure: Mounting Price and Risk of Neglect

Sandra Postel has a post on this topic on the AWRA blog. Here is what she says:

We typically think of water “infrastructure” as the collection of dams, levees, canals, pipelines, treatment plants and other engineering works that help provide water services to society. As Gerry Galloway pointed out in the last issue of IMPACT, this infrastructure is sorely in need of maintenance and upgrading. However, another class of infrastructure needs urgent attention as well: the aquatic ecosystems that provide so many valuable, but typically unpriced, goods and services to society.

Healthy rivers, floodplains, wetlands, and forested watersheds supply much more than water and fish. When functioning well, this “eco-infrastructure” stores seasonal floodwaters, helping to lessen flood damages. It recharges ground water, filters pollutants, purifies drinking water, and delivers nutrients to coastal fisheries. Most importantly, it provides the myriad habitats that support the diversity of plants and animals that perform so much of this work and keep the planet humming. It is difficult to place a dollar value on any one piece of this eco-infrastructure, but in 2005, scientists participating in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment estimated that wetlands alone provide services worth $200-940 billion per year.

The water strategies of the 20th Century worked largely against nature, rather than in concert with it. As a result, ecological infrastructure has been dismantled and degraded at a rapid rate. An estimated 25-55% of the world’s wetlands have been drained, 35% of global river flows are now intercepted by large dams and reservoirs, and more than 100 billion tons of nutrient-rich sediment that would otherwise have replenished deltas and coastal zones sits trapped in reservoirs. River flows are turned on and off like plumbing works, eliminating the natural flow patterns and habitats upon which myriad life forms depend.

Fortunately, forward-thinking planners, resource managers, and engineers from around the world are demonstrating that clean drinking water, flood control, and other human needs can be met in ways that use ecoinfrastructure rather than destroy it – and that such approaches often save money. For example, through watershed protection and aggressive conservation measures, cities as different as Bogotá, Colombia, and Boston, Massachusetts, have postponed construction of expensive water supply capital projects, saving their residents money while protecting critical ecosystems.

More typically, however, the benefits of capitalizing on nature’s services continue to go uncaptured. To cite just one example, following the Great Midwest Flood of 1993, U.S. researchers estimated that restoration of 13 million acres of wetlands in the upper portion of the Mississippi-Missouri watershed, at a cost of $2-3 billion, would have absorbed enough floodwater to have substantially reduced the $16 billion in flood damages. Unfortunately, instead of calling floodplains and wetlands back into active duty, officials in the region permitted even more floodplain development. According to Nicholas Pinter of Southern Illinois University in Carbondale, 28,000 new homes and 6,630 acres of commercial and industrial development have since been added on land that was under water in 1993.

Global warming and its anticipated effects on the hydrological cycle – including increased flooding, droughts, and storm intensity – will only add to the value of ecological infrastructure that helps mitigate these effects. For the same reason people buy home insurance and life insurance – to avoid catastrophic losses – societies need to buy more disaster insurance by investing in the protection and restoration of watersheds, floodplains, and wetlands.

March 26, 2008

Lester Brown's Plan B 3.0: Saving Civilization, One Planet at a Time

Lester R. Brown, who's been around forever and productive that entire time, has just published his revised Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization. He is Founder and President of the Earth Policy Institute (EPI).

Here is the Table of Contents (T of C), from where you can download the entire book for free. You can also buy copies on the WWW site.

Below is the press release from EPI.

6a00d8341bf80a53ef00e5517b5d58883_2

“In late summer 2007, reports of ice melting were coming at a frenetic pace. Experts were ‘stunned’ when an area of Arctic sea ice almost twice the size of Britain disappeared in a single week,” writes Lester R. Brown in his new book, Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization (W.W. Norton & Company).

“Nearby, the Greenland ice sheet was melting so fast that huge chunks of ice weighing several billion tons were breaking off and sliding into the sea, triggering minor earthquakes,” notes Brown, President and Founder of the Earth Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based independent environmental research organization.

These recent developments are alarming scientists. If we cannot stop this melting of the Greenland ice sheet, sea level will eventually rise 23 feet, inundating many of the world’s coastal cities and the rice-growing river deltas of Asia. It will force several hundred million people from their homes, generating an unimaginable flood of rising-sea refugees.

“We need not go beyond ice melting to see that civilization is in trouble. Business-as-usual is no longer a viable option. It is time for Plan B,” Brown says in Plan B 3.0, which was produced with major funding from the Farview, Lannan, Summit, and Wallace Genetic foundations, the U.N. Population Fund, Fred and Alice Stanback, and Andrew Stevenson.

“Plan B 3.0 is a comprehensive plan for reversing the trends that are fast undermining our future. Its four overriding goals are to stabilize climate, stabilize population, eradicate poverty, and restore the earth’s damaged ecosystems,” says Brown. “Failure to reach any one of these goals will likely mean failure to reach the others as well.”

Continuing rapid population growth is weakening governments in scores of countries. The annual addition of 70 million people to world population is concentrated in countries where water tables are falling and wells are going dry, forests are shrinking, soils are eroding, and grasslands are turning into desert. As this backlog of unresolved problems grows, stresses mount and weaker governments begin to break down.

The defining characteristic of a failing state is the inability of a government to provide security for its people. Somalia, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, and Pakistan are among the better known examples. Each year the number of failing states increases. “Failing states,” notes Brown, “are an early sign of a failing civilization.”

“Even as the accumulating backlog of unresolved problems is leading to a breakdown of governments in weaker states, new stresses are emerging. Among these are rising oil prices as the world approaches peak oil, rising food prices as an ever larger share of the U.S. grain harvest is converted into fuel for cars, and the spreading fallout from climate change.”

“At the heart of the climate-stabilizing initiative cited above is a detailed plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions 80 percent by 2020 in order to hold the future temperature rise to a minimum. This initiative has three major components—raising energy efficiency, developing renewable sources of energy, and expanding the earth’s tree cover. Reaching these goals,” says Brown, “will mean the world can phase out all coal-fired power plants.”

In setting the carbon reduction goals for Plan B, we did not ask “What do politicians think is politically feasible?” but rather “What do we think is needed to prevent irreversible climate change?” This is not Plan A: business-as-usual. This is Plan B: an all-out response at wartime speed proportionate to the magnitude of the threats facing civilization.

“We are in a race between tipping points in natural and political systems,” says Brown. “Which will come first? Can we mobilize the political will to phase out coal-fired power plants before the melting of the Greenland ice sheet becomes irreversible? Can we halt deforestation in the Amazon basin before it so weakens the forest that it becomes vulnerable to fire and is destroyed? Can we cut carbon emissions fast enough to save the Himalayan glaciers that feed the major rivers of Asia?”

Although efforts have been made in recent decades to raise the efficiency of energy use, the potential is still largely untapped. For example, one easy and profitable way to cut carbon emissions worldwide is simply to replace incandescent bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs that use only a fourth as much electricity. Turning to more efficient lighting can reduce world electricity use by 12 percent—enough to close 705 of the world’s 2,370 coal-fired power plants.

In the United States, buildings—commercial and residential—account for close to 40 percent of carbon emissions. Retrofitting an existing building typically can cut energy use by 20–50 percent. The next step, shifting to carbon-free electricity to heat, cool, and light the building completes the transformation to a zero-carbon emissions building.

We can also reduce carbon emissions by moving down the food chain. The energy used to provide the typical American diet and that used for personal transportation are roughly equal. A plant-based diet requires about one fourth as much energy as a diet rich in red meat. The reduction in carbon emissions in shifting from a red meat–rich diet to a plant-based diet is about the same as that in shifting from a Chevrolet Suburban SUV to a Toyota Prius hybrid car.

In the Plan B energy economy, wind is the centerpiece. It is abundant, low cost, and widely distributed; it scales easily and can be developed quickly. The goal is to develop at wartime speed 3 million megawatts of wind-generating capacity by 2020, enough to meet 40 percent of the world’s electricity needs. This would require 1.5 million wind turbines of 2 megawatts each. These turbines could be produced on assembly lines by reopening closed automobile plants, much as bombers were assembled in auto plants during World War II.

In the development of renewable energy resources, Brown notes, we are seeing the emergence of some big-time thinking—thinking that recognizes the urgency of moving away from fossil fuels. Nowhere is this more evident than in Texas, where the state government is coordinating an effort to build 23,000 megawatts of wind-generating capacity (the equivalent of 23 coal-fired power plants). This will supply enough electricity to satisfy the residential needs of over 11 million Texans—half the state’s population. Oil wells go dry and coal seams run out, but the earth’s wind resources cannot be depleted.

Solar technologies also provide exciting opportunities for getting us off the carbon treadmill. Sales of solar-electric panels are doubling every two years. Rooftop solar water heaters are spreading fast in Europe and China. In China, some 40 million homes now get their hot water from rooftop solar heaters. The plan is to nearly triple this to 110 million homes by 2020, supplying hot water to 380 million Chinese.

Large-scale solar thermal power plants are under construction or planned in California, Florida, Spain, and Algeria. Algeria, a leading world oil exporter, is planning to develop 6,000 megawatts of solar-thermal electric-generating capacity, which it will feed into the European grid via an undersea cable. The electricity generated from this single project is enough to supply the residential needs of a country the size of Switzerland.

Investment in geothermal energy for both heating and power generation is also growing fast, notes Brown. Iceland now heats nearly 90 percent of its homes with geothermal energy, virtually eliminating the use of coal for home heating. The Philippines gets 25 percent of its electricity from geothermal power plants. The United States has 61 geothermal projects under way in the geothermally rich western states.

The combination of gas-electric hybrid cars and advanced-design wind turbines has set the stage for the evolution of an entirely new automotive fuel economy. If the battery storage of the typical hybrid car is doubled and a plug-in capacity is added so that batteries can be recharged at night, then we could do our short-distance driving—commuting to work, grocery shopping, and so on—almost entirely with cheap, wind-generated electricity.

This would permit us to run our cars largely on renewable electricity—and at the gasoline-equivalent cost of less than $1 per gallon. Several major automakers are coming to market with plug-in hybrids or electric cars.

With business as usual (Plan A), the environmental trends that are undermining our future will continue. More and more states will fail until civilization itself begins to unravel. “Time is our scarcest resource. We are crossing natural thresholds that we cannot see and violating deadlines that we do not recognize,” says Brown. “These deadlines are set by nature. Nature is the timekeeper, but we cannot see the clock.”

The key to restructuring the world energy economy is to get the market to tell the environmental truth by incorporating into prices the indirect costs of burning fossil fuels, such as climate disruption and air pollution. To do this, we propose adopting a carbon tax that will reflect these indirect costs and offsetting it by lowering income taxes. We propose a worldwide carbon tax to be phased in at $20 per ton each year between 2008 and 2020, stabilizing at $240 per ton. This initiative, which would be offset at every step with a reduction in income taxes, would simultaneously discourage fossil fuel use and encourage investment in renewable sources of energy.

“Saving civilization is not a spectator sport,” says Brown. “We have reached a point in the deteriorating relationship between us and the earth’s natural systems where we all have to become political activists. Every day counts. We all have a stake in civilization’s survival.”

“We can all make lifestyle changes, but unless we restructure the economy and do it quickly we will almost certainly fail. We need to persuade our elected representatives and national leaders to support the environmental tax restructuring and other changes outlined in Plan B. Beyond this, each of us can pick an issue that is important to us at the local level, such as phasing out coal-fired power plants, shifting to more-efficient light bulbs, or developing a comprehensive local recycling program, and get to work on it.”

We all need to educate ourselves on environmental issues. For its part, the Earth Policy Institute is making Plan B 3.0 available for downloading free of charge from its
WWW site.

“It is decision time,” says Brown. “Like earlier civilizations that got into environmental trouble, we have to make a choice. We can stay with business as usual and watch our economy decline and our civilization unravel, or we can adopt Plan B and be the generation that mobilizes to save civilization. Our generation will make the decision, but it will affect life on earth for all generations to come.”

"We are here on Ear