Just finished the 'alliteration' module in my Famous Writers School curriculum. Fortunately, I stopped before I added 'buffalo' (as in 'water buffalo') to the end of the post's title.
Bruce Babbitt, former Secretary of the Interior and Arizona Governor and Attorney General, created quite a stir at the recent Aspen Environment Forum when he stated:
"Water scarcity is an issue — not everywhere, but in some regions.The American Southwest is not one of those regions where there is water scarcity. It's hard to believe, given all the hyping in the national and local and regional press."
This statement prompted incredulity on the part of his fellow panelist, Pat Mulroy, according to Janet Urquhart (read her entire article) of The Aspen Times:
Mulroy apparently found his statements hard to believe, as well. She has watched the Southwest lose the equivalent of an entire reservoir in the declining levels of Lake Mead and Lake Powell. Southern Nevada has implemented rigorous conservation regulations and has shifted its thinking to address the sharing of water, and suffering shortages, regionally, she said.
For example, water that Nevada is currently conserving is going to California.
“We will get it back when we need it,” Mulroy said. “We're starting to think as a larger consortium.”
Babbitt further explained:
“Put a price on it. Charge its real value,” he said, urging the elimination of subsidies that make water a bargain, particularly to agricultural users.
“Conservation is not a rational economic choice,” he said of the current situation.\
I understand what Babbitt was trying to say, although his statement that in the American Southwest 'water scarcity is not an issue' detracted greatly from his message. He simply is saying that if we price water accordingly, we'll have enough to meet our needs. Food will be more expensive (as Mulroy noted), of course, and lawns and golf courses will go brown. Low-value crops such as alfalfa might disappear.
It's interesting to note that before attending Harvard Law School, Babbitt initially studied earth science - he has a Bachelor's degree in geology (no doubt before there was a section on plate tectonics in the introductory textbooks) from Notre Dame and a Master's in geophysics from the University of Newcastle. Then he went to the dark side. I would encourage him to reconnect with his earth-science roots.
I would not have said what he did about scarcity in the Southwest; that's a hot-button issue for sure. His statement flies in the face of WaterWired's post yesterday and Emily Green's post on Lake Mead water levels. Her post also 'introduced' me to the Babbitt statement. The picture of the Colorado River delta by Jonathan Waterman is from her post.
Jonathan Waterman commented extensively on Babbitt's comment that there is no water scarcity in the Southwest, focusing on the Colorado River.
By the way, is it just me, or is there something incongruous about holding an environment forum in Aspen, a town that is synonymous with over-the-top opulence, replete with trophy homes, trophy wives, Hummers, and all the rest? [See Cynthia Barnett's comment about per capita water use in the area - 1,851 gallons pcpd!]
Maybe next year they could meet in Boulder.
Oh, by the way, Edward Abbey didn't think water was scarce in the Southwest either:
"There is no lack of water here, unless you try to establish a city where no city should be.”— Edward Abbey (thanks to Jon Talton)
Ms. Green your point is well made and I did indeed fail to substantively query your posting, thank you for bring it to my attention.
Respectfully,
Paul F Miller
Posted by: PAUL F MILLER | Tuesday, 03 August 2010 at 03:03 PM
Paul, I don't see any query in your "query" -- it does not deal with any of the points I made to do with Babbitt's actions in the Great Basin, as early engineer of what became the QSA or the crassness of his recent remarks in light of impending shortages faced by Arizona. That said, I find your comment interesting.
Posted by: Emily Green | Tuesday, 03 August 2010 at 09:50 AM
I write to query the comments of Ms. Green as I have lived in Arizona since the early 1970's when Babbitt was both AG and Governor and I need to compliment him on how he astutely postured himself as one of "common" folk, his "handlers" did a magnificent job.
Babbitt, in my opinion, to his credit, surrounded himself with sharp, quick, politically competent staff, who quickly read the "tea-leaves" to extract the last ounce posturing Babbitt to appear in whatever chameleon form that moment required and Arizona ate it up both as AG and Governor.
Moreover Babbitt became Governor of Arizona upon the death of Wesley Bolin, who was and retains a very warm spot in the hearts of most Arizona citizens for the true gentlemen he was. His "handlers" used and milked this situation for all it was worth.
Babbitt is credited with championing addressing WATER as an issue in Arizona establishing what now is our AMA (active management areas) respecting water. This action to date has neither solved nor substantively addressed Arizona's water issues, it has however provided abundant source of income for attorneys, water experts, and the grounds for a plethora of legal action surrounding water.
Babbitt's credentials as an "honest" environmentalist have been repeatedly challenged by many among them the Native Americas he claims are his friends. His position on the Board of the firm owning and operating the Snowbowl (ski resort) near Flagstaff,Arizona where sewage effluent is to be used as a source of snow on the mountain held by many southwest natives as sacred might be sufficient to give one pause about Babbitt's integrity.
Make no mistake ... Bruce Babbitt ... is first, foremost and always a capitalist.
WATER for him is only a commodity for sale to the highest bidder which he hopes he represents.
Respectfully,
Posted by: PAUL F MILL | Tuesday, 03 August 2010 at 08:49 AM
I have no statistics on trophy wives, but residents of Pitkin County, home of Aspen, have an average per-capita water use of 1,851 gallons a person. I think that is highest in Colorado ... highest in the West ... highest in the U.S. ... and highest in the world. http://bit.ly/6ATSQ3
Posted by: Cynthia Barnett | Tuesday, 03 August 2010 at 02:53 AM
Before being appointed to Interior, in 1989, the former Governor of Arizona was so aware of the potential damage to the Great Basin Aquifer if the Las Vegas pipeline went forward that he roused the rural protestants – urging them to fight. He’d stand with them!
But by the time he was tapped by Clinton in 1992, he suddenly couldn’t remember the names of the alfalfa farmers, café owners and otherwise inconsequential “rurals” who he’d rallied to fight an all powerful Las Vegas. He left them to be sliced down, their land values shot to hell, their businesses shuttered, many a life ruined.
As Interior Secretary, he may have had a stalking plan, which might have been to stare down California so hard, it freed up enough water from Mead to slake LV and spare the Great Basin. He does deserves credit for curing California of its surplus habit, but this happened just as the river dried up and was no use to the Great Basin. (Hey, what’s a 4-state natural wonder so empty that voters could be counted on an abacus when it comes to political poker?)
This recent statement is outrageous considering that his own state, Arizona, stands to be hardest hit when Colorado river shortages click in – which will be soon. The state that boomed out of control under him will be hardest hit by the allocation cuts.
Pontificating in Aspen, he may have thought he was cute setting up a straw dog. Let him try it in Phoenix in about two years time. He'll get some interesting "reviews."
Posted by: Emily Green | Monday, 02 August 2010 at 08:44 PM
From the perspective that WATER is nothing more than a commodity ... Babbitt's statement appears solid and valid. When one chooses to see WATER from the perspective of the "commons" his statement loses all credibility.
As AG, Governor and Sec of Interior ... Babbitt ... was anointed the genteel mantle of a tree-hugging-environmentalist, which when one peels away the veneer a dyed-in-the-wool-capitalist is clearly revealed.
One should not be surprised by Babbitt's statement about WATER and the Southwest as they are clearly aligned with his capitalist attitude about water.
I for one do not believe Babbitt made a Freudian slip rather he quite clearly drew a line in the sand. Question is what are "we" going to do...? If history is our guide, we will resume our characteristic ostrich posture and say and do ... nothing...
Posted by: PAUL F MILLER | Monday, 02 August 2010 at 01:35 PM